Australia fines Telegram for delay in answering child abuse, terror questions

6f9c0c2c f1ae 46ef ab84 ed89f50526b7
<>

By Renju Jose

Australia's online safety regulator on Monday fined messaging platform Telegram about A$1 million ($640,000) for its delay in answering questions about measures the app took to prevent the spread of child abuse and violent extremist material.

The eSafety Commission in March 2024 sought responses from social media platforms YouTube, X and Facebook to Telegram and Reddit, and blamed them for not doing enough to stop extremists from using live-streaming features, algorithms and recommendation systems to recruit users.

Telegram and Reddit were asked about the steps they were taking to combat child sexual abuse material on their services. They had to respond by May but Telegram submitted its response in October.

"Timely transparency is not a voluntary requirement in Australia and this action reinforces the importance of all companies complying with Australian law," eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant said in a statement.

Telegram's delay in providing information obstructed eSafety from implementing its online safety measures, Grant said.

Telegram said it had fully responded to all of eSafety's questions last year, with no outstanding issues.

"The unfair and disproportionate penalty concerns only the response time frame, and we intend to appeal," the company said in an email.

Australia's spy agency in December said one in five priority counter-terrorism cases investigated involved youths.

The messaging platform has been under growing scrutiny around the world since its founder Pavel Durov was placed under formal investigation in France in August in connection with alleged use of the app for illegal activities.

Durov, who is out on bail, has denied the allegations.

Grant said Big Tech must be transparent and put in place measures to prevent their services from being misused as the threat posed by online extremist materials poses a growing risk.

"If we want accountability from the tech industry we need much greater transparency. These powers give us a look under the hood at just how these platforms are dealing, or not dealing, with a range of serious and egregious online harms which affect Australians," Grant said.

If Telegram chooses to ignore the penalty notice, eSafety would seek a civil penalty in court, Grant said.

This article was produced by Reuters news agency. It has not been edited by Global South World.

More from Qonversations

Uncategorized

febfba7e b3b5 4f59 b1b0 7ad0ae9475d1

Explainer-What could be behind the Iberian power outage?

Uncategorized

e7eac609 5f37 4cc9 a88c 1ce597faa583

Rwanda deploys AI to check vehicle pollution  

Uncategorized

46b21dc1 7803 42ff 9f4c a9dd16b3f23b

Kenya’s new superpower: AI X-rays are detecting TB in seconds

Uncategorized

1098d1a7 110d 4fe6 8bf2 5ea1ae2314a5

China urges Japan to help fight US tariffs together, Kyodo reports

Front of mind