Is there a secret to longevity? This health expert says 1,000% yes
In the era of social media, post-COVID, and with mental health at the forefront, a shift is taking […]
The USA wants to avoid retaliation on Iran by Israel. Here’s why
U.S. President Joe Biden delivers remarks on healthcare coverage and the economy, at the White House in Washington, U.S. July 7, 2023. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst
Following Iran’s launch of over 300 drones and missiles towards Israel overnight in reaction to an earlier raid on its consulate in Syria, the White House has warned Israel from retaliating against Iran.
The facts
The majority of the inbound weapons were intercepted and shot down by Israeli, American, and ally forces.
President Joe Biden instructed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to carefully evaluate his reaction to Iran’s attack.
The Biden administration believes Israel came out ahead in the exchange.
During the attack, US military forces intercepted many Iranian projectiles, including drones and ballistic missiles. Biden and Netanyahu spoke during the heightened circumstances that followed the incident.
The US has indicated its wish to avoid further escalation of the crisis, both to Israel and Iran. Despite continuing to protect Israel, the United States has ruled out active involvement in any Israeli retaliation.
Some US senators and former officials have criticised the US position, calling for a harsher response or direct engagement in Israeli retribution attempts. Following the attack, House Speaker Mike Johnson stated that he intends to pursue military aid for Israel.
Previous efforts to enhance aid to Israel have been hampered by calls for greater help for Taiwan and Ukraine.
The arguments
The White House’s warning to Israel reflects a strategic approach to preventing further escalation in the area. Intercepting the majority of incoming weapons demonstrates the effectiveness of Israeli and allied defences, which may deter future attacks.
President Biden’s advice to Netanyahu emphasises the need of making strategic decisions to avoid escalating tensions.
The Biden administration’s opinion that Israel “got the best of it” indicates confidence in Israel’s military capability.
Critics suggest that the United States should take a more proactive approach, potentially assisting Israel in direct retaliation against Iran.
Advocates for increased military aid to Israel also argue that such assistance is critical for regional stability and serves US national security objectives.
Challenges in enacting assistance packages reflect deeper political problems, like balancing support for numerous allies in diverse global circumstances.
The attack highlighted persistent tensions in the Middle East and the complicated dynamics surrounding regional conflicts and alliances.
The US approach on avoiding direct engagement in Israeli reprisal strikes reflects a careful balance between defending allies and avoiding greater commitment in regional wars.
Calls for a stronger US response or direct involvement in Israeli activities against Iran reflect diverse viewpoints on the acceptable level of US engagement in the region.
